Note: There are a few ways to use this page. It mixes objective source material with light analysis and first-hand reporting so voters can choose their depth.
Where we add context or opinion, it’s to help busy voters make sense of gaps in local information. Not everyone has time to be a volunteer politico.
In this ~56-minute radio interview, Vineland School Board candidate Luz Vasquez joins InformTheVoteNJ.com’s Steven Solof on WVLT 92.1 to discuss her background, long-standing watchdog role at board meetings, and a platform organized around Educate, Empower, Equip. The conversation covers budget transparency, school safety (including gang dynamics and building security), attendance and truancy, and graduation readiness.
Background & Watchdog Perspective:
A lifelong Vineland resident and VHS graduate, Vasquez explains how years of regularly attending Board of Education meetings—and following up directly with
administrators—shape her approach. She wants the district to have vocal champions while still scrutinizing process and outcomes.
Platform — Educate · Empower · Equip:
Educate: focus on academics, age-appropriate materials, and a safe learning environment. Empower: ensure parents, students, and staff can speak
up without fear; resolve issues internally when possible while respecting teacher voice. Equip: align resources and programs so students graduate
truly prepared for next steps.
Budget Transparency & Participation:
Vasquez argues that presentations and data should be readable, accessible, and easy to obtain at meetings (e.g., handouts and links), so engagement isn’t
burdensome for families. She supports clear summaries that help the public track spending and outcomes.
Graduation Readiness & Fundamentals:
Responding to concerns about readiness metrics cited by the host, Vasquez references an 86.3% graduation rate versus a state range around
91–95%, setting a goal of 95–100%. She emphasizes time-on-task, pacing, and tailoring curriculum to local needs so core skills land earlier and more
consistently.
Safety, Gangs & Building Security:
Vasquez acknowledges gang-related dynamics and supports proactive intervention, staff training, and armed security. She also wants a close look at door protocols
and overall building-entry practices to reduce avoidable risks.
Attendance & Truancy:
On chronic absenteeism, she favors strengthening the parent–school bridge, coordinating with social services, and recognizing complex home situations (health,
single-parent households, incarceration) that impact daily attendance.
Final Thoughts:
Vasquez frames her campaign around transparency, positivity, and practical follow-through. Whether you’re lightly engaged or deeply invested in school issues,
this interview offers a clear look at how she would translate watchdog experience into board governance.
This table highlights the key topics covered in the interview, summarizing major takeaways per section.
Timestamp | Topic | Key Takeaways |
---|---|---|
0:00 | Intro & context | Why local coverage matters; election timeline; framing of key Board of Education issues for Vineland. |
5:50 | Interview begins | Vasquez introduces herself and her goals for the conversation. |
6:25 | Background & watchdog role | Lifelong Vineland resident and VHS grad; years of attending BOE meetings; describes herself as a “watchdog” who follows up with administration. |
10:00 | Community pride | Argues the district needs champions; wants to encourage and spotlight positives. |
11:00 | Marketing & outreach | Leverage social media plus in-person outreach; highlight student/staff achievements to build pride. |
14:20 | Path of improvement | Adult learner who grew up in poverty; education opened doors; persistence and resilience as themes. |
16:35 | Human Services degree | Program development and continuous improvement; combine qualitative stories with quantitative data for evaluation. |
20:35 | Platform: Educate / Empower / Equip | Educate: academics, age-appropriate materials, safety. Empower: parents, students, teachers; prefer internal resolution while protecting teacher voice. Equip: align resources to real readiness. |
29:45 | Budget & transparency | Presentations should be readable and accessible; provide handouts/links and reduce friction for public participation. |
33:15 | Graduation readiness | Host notes low readiness metrics (some reports ~35%); Vasquez cites 86.3% graduation vs. state ~91–95% (goal 95–100%). Emphasizes fundamentals, pacing, and local tailoring. |
42:40 | Safety & gangs | Acknowledges gang dynamics; supports proactive intervention, staff training, armed guards; wants a close look at door/security practices. |
46:30 | Attendance / truancy | Strengthen parent–school bridge; social-services follow-ups; notes complex home situations affecting attendance. |
51:15 | Caller: superintendent contract | Caller seeks a vote-pledge; Vasquez declines to pre-commit and redirects to her platform and process-driven approach. |
52:55 | Closing | Vasquez says this was her most thorough interview; reiterates transparency and a positive, solutions-focused campaign. |
55:50 | Paid announcement | Candidate’s paid spot summarizing priorities: parental rights, safety, support for staff, and fiscal management. |
Vasquez frames her approach around three pillars: Educate (focus on academics, age-appropriate materials, and a safe learning environment), Empower (parents, students, and educators are supported to speak up and participate), and Equip (families are connected with resources that address non-academic barriers to learning). She emphasizes decisions grounded in observation and data rather than trends.
Building on prior statements, Vasquez adds that readiness should be evaluated and improved through a cycle of
continuous assessment. She cites a current readiness rate of 86.3% locally versus roughly
91–94.9% statewide, with a state goal of 95–100%.
Note from InformTheVoteNJ: It was presented at an August school board meeting that math readiness for graduation
was at 35%, which could be perceived as a bottleneck for overall graduation readiness. We intend to follow up with
Luz for the discrepancy in stats.
She wants to reinforce
fundamentals (especially math and reading), ensure students get sufficient time-on-task, and tailor pacing so that
students master core skills before moving on. She is open to more locally responsive curriculum choices when
statewide trends don’t fit community needs.
Safety remains a top priority. Vasquez supports maintaining armed guards and proactive intervention between feuding groups, including staff trained to recognize gang dynamics. She plans to evaluate facility access (e.g., side and rear doors) to reduce vulnerabilities while keeping front-entrance security strong.
Vasquez seeks a stronger parent–school bridge and timely follow-ups when attendance flags occur. She favors coordination with social services when appropriate and stresses that many attendance problems have complex home causes—so the district should identify issues early and connect families to help.
Vasquez wants educators to be free to share concerns and ideas without fear of repercussion. She encourages resolving issues internally first when possible, while making sure teacher input is genuinely heard. She views staff voice as essential to student outcomes.
Consistent with fiscal stewardship, Vasquez also wants the district’s public presentations—especially budgets—to be easy to follow. That includes readable visuals and providing handouts or online materials so attendees can participate meaningfully rather than straining to see tiny numbers on distant screens.
Vasquez identifies parental rights as a high priority. She believes parents should have primary influence in their children’s education and advocates for policies that strengthen the home-to-school connection while opposing policies that reduce parental involvement. She also emphasizes timely notification when challenges arise and connecting families to community resources.
She wants meetings and reports (e.g., graduation readiness and budget data) presented in ways the public can easily review—so residents who already show up are not made to feel like a burden for asking clarification questions.
Vasquez acknowledges ongoing behavior and safety concerns and supports proactive steps to deter fights and gang activity, while maintaining a learning environment where teachers can teach and students can learn without distraction.
Vasquez is a lifelong resident of Vineland and a proud graduate of Vineland High School. She speaks often about civic pride—“bleeding red and gray”—and wants to serve as a champion for students, staff, and administrators.
Her graduate studies emphasized program development and a cycle of continuous improvement using both qualitative (stories of impact) and quantitative (measurable outcomes) data. She intends to apply that lens to board work—evaluating what works, modifying what doesn’t, and avoiding trend-chasing.
An adult learner who grew up in poverty, Vasquez returned to her studies to complete her degrees while raising a family. She cites education as “the greatest equalizer” and a key to unlocking opportunity.
A regular attendee of Board of Education meetings since 2018, Vasquez has delivered annual reorganization remarks and frequently follows up with administrators to ensure concerns are addressed. She describes her role as a respectful watchdog—encouraging responsiveness to parents, students, and staff.
Vasquez is running a positive, multi-channel campaign—leveraging social media, neighborhood outreach, and public forums—to spotlight student and staff achievements and encourage a culture of encouragement over cynicism.
While the Vineland School Board race is non-partisan, Vasquez identifies as conservative and notes that her faith informs her outlook. She also stresses that decisions should be grounded in data and observation rather than trends.
Vasquez distinguishes herself through long-standing advocacy on behalf of children and parents, a data-driven mindset from her human services background, and proactive follow-ups with administration when educators raise concerns. In the radio interview, when pressed by a caller to pre-commit on a future superintendent vote, she declined to be “boxed into a corner,” redirecting to her platform and overall priorities.
As a lifelong Vineland resident, a product of the Vineland public school system and a very proud graduate of Vineland High School, I am personally invested in the mission to improve student outcomes while looking out for the best interest of local taxpayers in our community. I want to see our district succeed at every level.
As a professional with a master’s degree in human services, I understand the value of education and how a good education can open doors to opportunities that would otherwise not be available. I grew up not having a whole lot of money and was determined to change that for my family. I understand the struggles for families and students just trying to survive. If elected, I can bring that perspective to the board when committees are brainstorming ways to resolve certain issues.
As a community member, I have been attending board of education meetings since my kids were in school, but even more since the curriculum changed in 2019. As a parent, I was determined to be watchful of what was being taught and policies that were being adopted. Yearly, I would make presentations to the new board congratulating them and urging them to do what is best for parents and students. I have been a regular at the meetings and if elected, will continue to be involved at a much higher level.
There is no single item that defines my candidacy. Improving student outcomes is a complex issue with many variables. More specifically, I hope to work with the board and administration to improve graduation ready rates, keep everyone safe, lower absenteeism rates, and improve working conditions for staff—all while maintaining a budget that will not put an undue strain on local taxpayers.
It is important to have a continuous process of evaluating current practices and policies to determine how effective they are, while remaining flexible enough to modify based on both qualitative and quantitative data.
Working as a team with the board and administration in a collaborative way is the best approach to these complex challenges.
Parental Rights is a priority for me. Parents have the primary authority and influence over their child’s upbringing. I believe that involving parents more deeply in educational decisions leads to better academic, behavioral, and emotional outcomes for students. A stronger home-to-school connection is what we need.
I will advocate for policies that include parents in the decision-making process and will oppose policies that remove parental involvement from decisions concerning their child.
This is a non-partisan election, and I do not wish to alienate any voters because of party affiliation. However, as a person of faith, I approach issues from a conservative perspective and believe in viewing policy decisions through that lens.
I do not have formal campaign events scheduled, but I continue to make my rounds at local book bag drives and community block parties, sharing my message directly with voters in the community.
I can only speak for myself. For many years, I have built a reputation for advocating on behalf of children and parents—making presentations to the community, speaking at the State Board of Education, at legislative hearings, and at local school board meetings about issues that matter to me as a parent and community member. Running for the Board of Education is a natural progression of this long-standing advocacy and my commitment to pursuing the best outcomes for students, staff, and the local community.